Mu­sic & Na­ture: How do you feel now about a prac­ti­cal re­la­tion­ship be­tween your­selves or Mi­cro Mu­sic La­bo­ra­to­ries^® and phar­ma­ceu­tics?

Peter Hübner: Firstly, there would have to be mutual com­pro­mise. There is al­ready full agree­ment on the fun­da­men­tal issue of an ob­jec­tive sci­en­tific ap­proach to medi­cal meth­ods and re­sults and I also be­lieve that phar­ma­ceu­tics is open to the ba­sic har­monic con­sid­era­tions; since they cer­tainly wish to re­duce the un­wanted side-ef­fects caused by their prod­ucts. With­out doubt they want to op­ti­mise the medi­cal ef­fect of their prod­ucts and thirdly, they do not want to be steam-rolled by the com­pe­ti­tion or by time.

These are the ba­sic pre-req­ui­sites of a re­la­tion­ship. I per­son­ally do not want to find my­self in com­pe­ti­tion with phar­ma­ceu­tics, nor to ma­no­evre pharma­ceu­tics into the same situa­tion, be­cause I be­lieve that even Medi­cal Reso­nance Ther­apy Mu­sic^® can­not re­place this branch of in­dus­try en­tirely. At the moment, there seems to be a more wide­spread in­sight into the laws of na­ture, and par­ticu­larly in the har­monic laws of na­ture, in my par­ticu­lar area than in chem­is­try, and there­fore in phar­ma­ceu­tics.
It is my view that the start­ing points for har­monic re­search and de­vel­op­ment to achieve such a level of knowl­edge lie in­tel­li­gently in the mi­cro­cosm of mu­sic – pro­vided it con­cerns only this spe­cial har­monic knowl­edge. The method of ob­tain­ing such knowl­edge on the har­monic laws of na­ture us­ing chemi­cal la­bo­ra­to­ries would seem by com­pari­son more in­volved and there­fore more dif­fi­cult.

It may per­haps be pos­si­ble to trans­fer har­monic knowl­edge from the mi­cro­cosm of mu­sic to the field of chem­is­try – as Kepler de­scribed in as­tron­omy when he de­rived his planet laws origi­nally from the mi­cro­cosm of mu­sic, ap­plied them to as­tron­omy and only found con­fir­ma­tion later through pre­cise as­tro­nomic in­ves­ti­ga­tions.

Pythagoras also pro­posed this method fun­da­men­tally as it is quicker, sim­pler and less in­volved. The rea­son for this alone lies in the natu­ral dis­po­si­tion of our hear­ing; we hear in the frame of mathe­mati­cal func­tions.
But this situa­tion brings with it its own prob­lems; I rec­og­nise the fact that great de­mands are be­ing placed on my time which means that I am trans­fer­ring my sci­en­tific knowl­edge of mu­sic to the field of chem­is­try and in do­ing so, ne­glect­ing my work with mu­sic.

The other way would be for chem­is­try to tackle the first proc­ess of in­te­grat­ing har­monic laws into its area of sci­ence, and phar­ma­ceu­ti­cal ap­pli­ca­tions and oc­ca­sion­ally draw on the knowl­edge from the mi­cro­cosm of mu­sic.
This would make chem­is­try, af­ter mu­sic, the sec­ond larg­est dis­ci­pline to in­te­grate har­monic laws of na­ture into its fun­da­men­tal knowl­edge.
This step can­not be avoided – just as my Medi­cal Reso­nance Ther­apy Mu­sic^® was un­able to avoid it, since chemi­cal prepa­ra­tions are ap­plied to bio­logi­cal sys­tems and, bio­logi­cal sys­tems func­tion har­moni­cally

Pythagoras had al­ready rec­og­nised the har­monic func­tions of the bio­logi­cal sys­tem and mod­ern chrono-medics have for a long­time been find­ing sci­en­tific proof for this fact.

Some sort of co-op­era­tion be­tween Mi­cro Mu­sic La­bo­ra­to­ries^® and phar­ma­ceu­tics or be­tween my­self and phar­ma­cists would there­fore be use­ful in help­ing to re­duce costs and de­velop im­proved medi­cines and it would also help re­duce un­wanted side ef­fects.

Mu­sic & Na­ture: And if your mu­si­cal medi­cal prod­ucts squeeze phar­ma­ceu­tics out in ar­eas where they are sim­ply su­pe­rior, phar­ma­ceu­tics can ex­pect to suffer ma­jor losses.

Peter Hübner: Such prob­lems will only occur if phar­ma­ceu­tics con­tin­ues to avoid such an im­por­tant de­vel­op­ment. But I don`t think this is the case and I will do eve­ry­thing in my power to pre­vent such un­in­tel­li­gent, crass and un­de­served com­pe­ti­tion be­tween these two sec­tors of in­dus­try.